A PSPO is a statutory power that allows a council to address a particular nuisance or problem in any given area that is detrimental to the local community’s quality of life. The order works by imposing conditions on the behaviours within the identified area which applies to everyone. They are designed to ensure that the law-abiding majority can use and enjoy public spaces, safe from anti-social behaviour.

A PSPO can be made for a period of up to three years with the option to extend it for up to another three years at a time. It is being recommended that this PSPO would be introduced for an initial period of three years. An extension can be for up to three more years and a PSPO can be extended more than once.

An in-depth summary of the consultation’s results can be found in Appendix A (from page 12 onwards) of the report to be considered at MVDC’s Scrutiny and Cabinet meetings.

A summary of the top-level results can be found here:

• The consultation yielded 990 responses. Along with the quantitative results, there were an enormous number of free text responses provided, amounting to 125 pages of comments.
• 62% of respondents were in favour of a PSPO, 29% were not in favour, and 9% didn’t know.
• 87% of responses were from Mole Valley residents. 34% were from the area being consulted on (Westhumble, Mickleham and Givons Grove).
• Residents of Givons Grove, Mickleham and Westhumble showed a higher level of support, with 85% in favour, 11% not in favour, and 4% didn’t know.
• Areas identified as experiencing most antisocial vehicle activity within the proposed PSPO area were the A24 from the Denbies roundabout to the Burford Bridge psuedo-roundabout (49%), the A24 from the Burford Bridge psuedo-roundabout to the Givons Grove roundabout (48%), the car park at Ryka’s Café (30%), and the Old London Road, Mickleham (19%).
• Other areas outside that highlighted in the survey included A24 (Givons Grove to Beaverbrook roundabout, Leatherhead (35 mentions), A24 (between Denbies and Deepdene roundabouts (30), Zig Zag Road, Boxhill (23), Pixham Lane (17), A24 (between Knoll and Beaverbrook roundabouts, Leatherhead (16), Young Street, Leatherhead (13). Many respondents also referred to the Zig Zag Road in other free text comments.
• The top three antisocial vehicle activities were considered to be speeding (66%), revving of engines (64%), and sudden/ rapid acceleration (64%).
• During the week issues were considered worse in the evenings and afternoons, and at weekends all day.
• 55% of consultees considered issues occurred all year, and 43% that they were mainly in the spring and summer.

Download PDF of the map

The above image and PDF show the proposed area in Mole Valley this PSPO would cover. The section of the A24 south of Dorking, the Old London Road, and Mickleham (B2209) roads were included in a previous version of the map, which formed part of the public consultation in 2025. 

The nearby Zig Zag Road is an additional area now being recommended for inclusion in the PSPO area. This follows consultation responses from the Police and National Trust, who own the road, detailing similar reports of anti-social behaviour by drivers and riders being reported to them, extending to the area up to Box Hill.

Following analysis of responses to our consultation, if it is decided to introduce a PSPO it would be an offence to perform any of the following activities:

• Revving of engine
• Engine Idling (stationary vehicle)
• Speeding
• Performing stunts with motor vehicles
• Driving on convoy 
• Vehicle exhaust popping or backfiring
• Racing
• Sudden/Rapid acceleration 

Activities that formed part of the public consultation which are not being recommended for inclusion in the PSPO (because they were not considered a significant issues) are: 

• Obstruction on a public highway
• Sounding horns
• Playing music
• Using threatening or intimidating behaviour

Whilst the police have a number of powers to enforce aspects of this anti-social driver and rider behaviour, the additional enforcement opportunities afforded by a PSPO would include the ability to issue fixed penalty notices on the spot if the activity in contravention of the Order is witnessed by enforcement officers.

The consultation did not include questions around methods of enforcement. The results of the consultation were to inform MVDC and the police of driver behaviour in the identified area. 

It is the current position of MVDC and the police that the introduction of acoustic cameras is not an effective solution to the issued reported. This view is based on the lack of convincing evidence of their effectiveness in providing enforcement for anti-social behaviour relating to motorcycles. 

This is the open letter setting out this position in further detail. It was issued to the local community in September 2025 in response to calls in some quarters for acoustic cameras to be introduced as a primary method of enforcement. 

Councillors will be discussing the recommendation to introduce a PSPO at meetings in March 2026. This matter will first be considered on 3 March by our Scrutiny Committee, before a final decision is taken by Cabinet on 17 March.

Either meeting can be watched live on the night or afterwards in the days and weeks that follow via our webcast service.